Moen cash flow rewards

Join Groundfloor with my referral link and earn $50 to invest!
Earn 10% average annual returns
Pay no fees to invest
Generate consistent cash flow
https://app.groundfloor.us/b22788

Install and register in the Cleo App for free

Install now

BUILD CREDIT (WITHOUT A CREDIT CARD)**
Glide your way to smoother approvals, lower interest rates, and higher credit limits with a credit score your parents can be proud of. Start building your credit with:
- 0% interest (APR)
- Cashback*** on everyday spends
- Cash advance***
- Credit score coaching
LEGAL STUFF
** Credit Builder Card is issued by WebBank, Member FDIC pursuant to a license from Visa USA Inc. Access to the Card is subject to approval.
* "Cash/Salary Advance" and "Cashback Rewards" are features of the Cleo Builder Subscription and not the Credit Builder Card. The "Card Cash Advance" is a feature unique to the Credit Builder Card and allows you to advance cash at an ATM. The Cash Card Advance is subject to a $2.50 fee per transaction plus any fee that may be charged by the ATM or Bank. This feature is only available to holders of the Credit Builder Card.

​
Guys,
Another good event is happening now, don't miss it!
Surely we all need this, Imprint Stone Unpairing Kit [Plus] x3
All you need to do is screenshot of Aegis system with 100%. If you don't have enough cashe nuts, try soul quest, other dungeons, etc you will harvest them fast!
Below is details for event. easy.
​
https://forum.netmarble.com/kofg_en/view/13/82157
Hello! This is CM Yuri.
The scheduled date of the invasion of the Trojan Horse, which got powerful with the power of the Phantom Gate, is just around the corner!😖😣
In order to prepare for the Trojan Horse, an event where you can obtain generous rewards has been crafted! For this, you need to increase the Fighter's Synchronization Rate, and achieve a rate of 100%,
If you prove the achievement of XV Chizuru Kagura or Lady Goenitz's 100% Synchronization Rate, there will be some standard rewards and 🎁Extra Rewards🎁!! Don’t miss the opportunity!
Read below for more details.
◈ Aegis System Synchronization Rate 100% Achievement Event
▶ Event Schedule
- 06/05 02:00 - 06/13 07:59 (PDT)
▶ Event Schedule
① Acquire the Cache Nut items necessary to increase the Synchronization Rate in [Aegis System] through various game contents.
② As shown in the example below, take a screenshot of one or more fighters selected for the [Aegis System] with a Synchronization Rate of 100%.
③ Post it in the comments and participation will be complete.
​
Event Rewards
Recipients
Rewards
All participants with
at least 1 Fighter who reached a 100% Synchronization Rate
AP 1,000
Elite Transcend Material Card x10
All participants who achieved a 100% Synchronization Rate for XV Chizuru Kagura or Lady Goenitz
[Extra Reward]
Imprint Stone Unpairing Kit [Plus] x3
EX Core Board Reset Item x3
▶ Rewards Distribution Schedule
- Sequential Distribution after 06/16
▶ Please Note
※ This event is limited to a single participation per account.
※ It is necessary to comply with the event participation rules to be recognized for participation.
※ For Contenders with multiple comments, only the latest comment within the event period will be accepted as participation.
※ A user shall not use another’s participation data and if so, will be removed from the reward list.
※ Comments unfit for this event or that go against the rules of the event may be removed.
※ Screenshots that are difficult to see with the naked eye may be excluded from participating in the event.
※ Schedule is subject to change depending on the event's progress.

Just applied for BILT after debating CSP and/or VX for my next card. Decided not to go for CSP/VX since projected spending habits aren't going to make them worth it when looking at AFs. I also feel as if the CSP overlaps with so many of my other cards that it isn't worth it at this time when also taking into account I don't think I will hit the $4k min spend for SUB.
BILT Instant Approval Starting CL: $10,000 (first 5-digit CL!)
Current Cards:
DiscoverIT: $4,950, opened Aug 2018
BoA Cash Rewards: $2,000, opened Aug 2020
Chase Freedom Flex: $4,400, opened Apr 2021
Apple Card by GS: $3,750, opened Aug 2021
Citi Simplicity (product changing to CCC end of this month when it's eligible): $2,000, opened May 2022
CapOne SavorOne: $8,000, opened Nov 2022
FICO Score: TU 733, EX 755, EQ 720
Oldest Account: 4 yrs 10 months
Cards Opened in 6mos/12mos/24mos: 0/1/3
Income: $67,000

I helped a friend start a company by loaning some money and was treasurer for a few years. I was trying to help him and had no expectation of profiting financially. I withdrew from the company and had no involvement for several years. The company itself (technology) seemed to be in the perpetual planning stage and I never expected it to go anywhere. I remained good friends with the founder.
I started receiving stock certificates for significant amounts of stock. The owner told me the stock was compensation for services over the years. The company had been in the red the entire time I'd been associated with it. I wasn't very optimistic the stock had any real value. The company had somehow survived on capital contributions for a long long time but hadn't generated any material cash flow. I didn't think much about it.
I had a falling out with the owner over something stupid. I decided to look more closely at the stock situation. I found there had been several other business entities created by the owner or agent using the same brand name. I contacted the owner and requested financial records, and none were forthcoming. Although I expected the company to fizzle out, judging by their website and recent press releases, business is starting to boom and some high profile people have joined the executive level. I'm starting to wonder if that stock might be worth something.
I don't want to incur out of pocket legal fees since I don't know what the actual value might be or if the company is playing games with stock to leave shareholders in the dust. Is this a situation where an attorney might do a contingency arrangement at least to see what kind of value there might be? I guess I wouldn't mind paying an attorney if it was just for securing financial records, but it would be nice to know what's going on. Any suggestions?

• Current cards: Delta Amex Gold, $11k limit, opened 2018, BoA Alaska Visa, $1.1k, 2009, Chase Amazon Prime Visa, $11k, 2008
• FICO Score: 830
• Oldest account age: 15 years
• Chase 5/24 status: 0/24
• Income: $250k+
• Average monthly spend and categories:
  • dining $300
  • groceries: $400
  • gas: $100
  • travel: $5-6k in the next 6 months
• Open to Business Cards: No
• What's the purpose of your next card? Travel
• Do you have any cards you've been looking at? US Bank Altitude Reserve or the Capital One Venture X
• Are you OK with category spending or do you want a general spending card? Not sure

I'm going to be spending a bunch on travel in the next 6-12 months and would like to accumulate more rewards. From the math it looks like the VX or AR would be the best, and it's kind of a tossup which is actually ahead based on the spending I'd put on them. Does it make sense to even hold both since their multipliers are different? Like use the Venture X for the travel credit and as a catchall where mobile payments aren't available and online, and use the AR for the rest of travel and all mobile payments? Or would it be better to commit to just one of those cards since they both have relatively high annual fees? At the moment I'm kind of leaning towards AR since the travel credit and the 1.5cpp cash back for travel expenses is a lot simpler than with VX and the breakeven point where the AR surpasses the VX is pretty achievable.
If holding both does make sense, which of them would be best to apply for first?
I found another post asking this but would be interested in hearing more peoples' thoughts on this.
Or if there's something completely different that would be even better I'd be open to that too.

Sent an email to Andrew Glen yesterday with thoughts and rationale on pre-petition ("long") and post-petition (e.g., distressed asset buyers) shareholders. "Petition" of course refers to the Ch 11 petition filed on Feb 13, 2013. Also included what "longs" have suffered over the past months and years, including dilutions. Did not ask for a reply and did not receive a reply today.
Thought about it some more and refined my thought process. Below is the plan I communicated to Andrew just now in a follow-up email. The definitions have been carefully worded. I changed from pre-petition and post-petition shareholders to: SCLX Dividend shareholders and Post--Scilex Dividend shareholders.
I grappled with those that purchased shares for the first time (i.e., did not receive SCLX dividend shares) between Jan 10 and Feb 12. Other than a possible exception(s), I don't believe they are "longs" like those here in our Sub. IMO, new buyers of shares came around because of the buzz from the SCLX dividend. The stock had been falling and was around $.95 to $1.20 during that time.
I stated that I don't expect a reply but asked that Andrew to consider this simple framework/rationale and forward the plan to Dr. Ji and CRO Meghji. Perhaps they are already thinking of the shareholder categories for payout in the same way -- but what if they are not? Principle: Make No Assumptions. Felt impelled to ensure that Andrew (and hopefully Dr. Ji and the CRO) understand shareholders' reasonable expectations and rationale.
Certainly, the specifics related to the granting of shares/warrants of the restructured Sorrento are for them to work out.
I have been struggling with distressed asset buyers and other new buyers coming in after the Ch 11 filing and buying hundreds of thousands to millions of shares and getting a possible unbelievable payout multiple, while "longs" have taken it in the shorts and may or may not even come out whole in the end -- much less make a multiples type return.
I was a strong advocate for the Equity Committee from the beginning. Most, if not all, members are distressed asset entities as many of you already know. Those members of the EC have to own shares (equity) to be on the EC. Then, as a byproduct of being on the EC, they are privy to nonpublic information via the data room, meetings with creditors, valuation and market potential information put forth by the couple of companies doing such work, and probably some general updates on the bid process. I presume they use this knowledge to give them an advantage in potentially bidding on assets if allowed. I am unsure as to what limitations there are. I think this is a good and reasonable thing. Remember, until Hertz (and maybe a few much smaller Ch 11's), there was no payout to shareholders in a Ch 11. So, distressed asset buyers are needed to make bids.
The EC did hire Andrew Glenn, which was a fantastically good move! Therefore, I conclude the EC turned out to be a blessing. I also emailed the original EC counsel, Shari Heyen (now co-counsel with Andrew), last Friday. She and her firm, as noted in a recent post, are highly experienced and successful! I asked for consideration that 50% of any PSS jury trial award(s) be paid out to what I am now referring to as SCLX Dividend shareholders (as defined in the below email). Perhaps this is thinking a little outside the box, but since "long" shareholders have suffered through predatory PSS's actions and the stock has been decimated, it only makes sense that "longs" get some recovery. If there were a $1.1B settlement (net of attorneys fees) and no Ch 11 filed, it would have been worth $2 per share (551M shares) to "longs" plus some blue-sky premium because it would mean Sorrento could run for 2+ years at its then current expense run-rate. I didn't ask for a reply and I haven't received one.
In any event, we can't have SRNEQ share purchases on or after Feb 13 make a 10x to 20x or more return when "longs" are the ones that have suffered for months and years. We deserve the lion's share of the payout.
-----------------------------------------------------------
The framework put forth in the email:
​

• Conceptually, Sorrento should have the right to choose which category of shareholders is to receive any of the components of a payout plan and determine the detailed breakdown of the payout plan (cash, shares/warrants in the restructured company).
• “Long” shareholders, defined below as SCLX Dividend shareholders, deserve to be rewarded with the greatest payout/plan.
• “Shorts” do not deserve any payout, as their actions have damaged Sorrento.
• Distressed asset entities arguably deserve the opportunity for some return on their investment.

Keeping it simple:
“SCLX Dividend shareholders” are defined as those entities that were dividended SCLX shares and, very importantly, are currently SRNEQ shareholders (no matter when they acquired their SRNEQ shares) and will remain such at least until the announcement of the Ch 11 exit and payout plan.

• This definition very likely excludes institutions (e.g., hedge funds), several of which held short positions of SRNE in the past—helping drive down the share price. [Dr. Ji should really like this concept.]
  • My belief is most, if not all, of them sold the bulk of their shares soon after the Ch 11 petition filing was announced on Feb 13, 2023. If the aforementioned is accurate, this definition is very appropriate.

“Post–SCLX Dividend shareholders” are defined as those entities that were not dividended SCLX shares, acquired their SRNE shares on or after January 10, 2023 (the day following the SCLX dividend record date), and very importantly, are currently SRNEQ shareholders (no matter when they acquired their SRNEQ shares) and will remain such at least until the announcement of the Ch 11 exit and payout plan.

• This definition very likely includes a fair number of distressed asset entities, which purchased shares on or after the Feb 13, 2023 Ch 11 petition filing date.
  • I am aware of one such entity, Millennium Management (CEO is Israel Englander), which had SEC filings showing some $10M of shares purchased (around 50M shares if I recall correctly). I have no idea how many SRNEQ shares are currently owned by these types of entities. I am very confident Dr. Ji would not be in favor of a large payout to these entities in comparison to “long” shareholders that stuck with Sorrento through share dilutions and numerous trials and tribulations along the way—because we believe Sorrento’s science will have an enormously positive impact on the sick and diseased in this world.

My strong recommendation is:
SCLX Dividend shareholders (readily identifiable):

• Cash payout is not capped (the maximum possible).
• Generous grant of shares and warrants of the restructured Sorrento (tba).

Post–SCLX Dividend shareholders:

• Cash payout is capped at no more than $.40 per share (the least possible, even $0.00).
• No grant of shares or warrants of the restructured Sorrento.

--------------------------------------------------------
Good night all and we live to fight another day!

Posted a couple months ago about which travel card to get, ended up going with the Venture X. I wasn’t pre-approved or anything, I applied online and received instant approval for 30k credit limit. Total cards I have now: 2.
Current cards: - BofA Cash Rewards World Mastercard, 38k limit, opened ~2016 - Used to have a Capital one credit card (opened ~2011 but scarcely used), and they closed it earlier this year after 5 years of inactivity…oops
FICO Score: 803 from the BofA app
Oldest account age: 7 years for the BofA credit card.
I haven't applied for a credit card since 2016.
Current income: $250k
Age: 33
Thank you all again for helping me choose a card!