2023.05.30 17:00 _call-me-al_ [Tue, May 30 2023] TL;DR — Crypto news you missed in the last 24 hours on Reddit
2023.05.25 12:11 FyrestarOmega Lucy Letby Trial, Defense Day 9, 25 May, 2023
Nicholas Johnson KC is continuing to cross-examine Lucy Letby on Child H. Sky News:
Letby is asked if staffing issues contributed to Child H's collapse. She says "no", but believes the "management of the chest drains" was a contributory factor.
LL: "I believe it has been accepted throughout the trial that there were issues with the chest drains".
Letby said the location of the chest drains on Child H may have been a factor, and that Child H's pneumothoraces were not treated correctly, due to a lack of experience and "nobody seemed particularly confident" on managing the number of chest drains - she says that was down to "multiple" doctors. Asked who those wuold be, Letby said that would include Dr [Ravi] Jayaram, Dr [David] Harkness, Dr [John] Gibbs and "Dr [Alison] Ventress, even".
Letby says she had dealt with chest drains in Liverpool, but not at the Countess of Chester Hospital. She says she did not have much experience, and had a nursing colleague to assist her in the care of Child H.
The court is shown a Facebook message Letby sent to a colleague on 24 September 2015 in which she complained about the unit being unsafe. Chester Standard:
The message reads: 'It's completely un safe [angry face emoticon]. Yeah I told [colleague] that & she is going to look into it. I still have to do next Wed day as can't cover it but getting paid as over time for last night. [sic]'
Letby admits she also lacked experience dealing with the chest drains Child H required. She says she had to get assistance from a colleague.
She is then asked about the help her colleague gave her.
"I can't remember every detail and I think it would be unrealistic if I could remember every detail," she tells the court.
Letby is asked about the time between 8pm and 2am on September 25-26. She says she cannot recall, specifically, the assistance she had from a nursing colleague that night, but she was there 'on and off', and "gave me a lot of verbal advice that night" in the management of Child H's chest drains, and on baptism after the collapse of Child H. Sky News:
Mr Johnson reads from Child H's father's statement. He refers to being at the unit until "about midnight", and was woken up from home "in the early hours".
His statement, first heard by the court in January 2023, is now being re-read to the court - it says: Chester Standard
"She was in an incubator and on c-pap to help her breathe...
"On the Friday I had been there late with Child H's grandmother, until about midnight. We had come back to the house and I was awoken by her in the early hours."
The prosecution says this witness statement shows that notes written by Letby at 4.28am "misrepresented the time" of Child H's problems.
Letby's notes say a senior doctor was present - something the prosecution says she has falsified
Letby's nursing note is shown to the court. It includes: '...x2 chest drains in situ at start of shift - intermittently swinging. Serous fluid++ accumulating.
'2330 Bradycardia and desaturation requiring Neopuff in 100% to recover. 10ml air aspirated from chest drain by Reg Ventress...inserted a 3rd chest drain...'
Mr Johnson says Letby misrepresented the time of this event.
Letby tells the court she would have got that time from her notes written at the time.
An intensive care chart is shown to the court. It includes, for 2200 - '2210 desat...SHO present...serous fluid++ x2 drain'
Letby says she cannot recall which SHO was on duty that night. Mr Johnson says the SHO on duty was Jessica Scott, and she has not recorded a note saying she was present for this.
Another note 'Brady desat 2330 10ml aspirated from...drain...' Other details are '+clear [in the OP row]' and '+small blood stained [in the Suction ET row]'.
Mr Johnson says this is another child producing blood in Letby's care.
Letby says this blood has likely come from the ET Tube in the lungs. She denies moving it around to destabilise Child H.
Letby accepts that a 52% desaturation is a potentially serious event. Sky News:
She says: "I don't agree" to the suggestion she has "cooked the books" in the nursing notes.
She denies falsifying notes for Child H by giving the impression Child H was deteriorating prior to the collapse.
Letby is asked why the '52% desautation' is not in her nursing note.
"Not every single thing gets written down...that is an error on my part."
Letby says the SHO was present for that earlier desaturation.
Letby denies writing in the intensive care chart after Child H's collapse.
NJ: "You're making this up as you go along, aren't you?"
LL: "No."
Mr Johnson says Child H's father's statement, which was agreed evidence, did not mention a collapse or an SHO being present.
Letby denies lying.
Mr Johnson claims Letby hasn't included the name of the senior doctor present because one wasn't there. Chester Standard:
"It's common practice to write SHO or Reg," Letby says, adding that it is something that "all staff would do"
"In your case, it seems to happen when babies collapsed," Mr Johnson says.
"I can't answer that, we are only looking at collapsed babies, we aren't looking at my whole work over four years," Letby replies.
Mr Johnson says Child H's father's statement has "no mention of seeing his baby collapsing" and "no mention of a doctor being there".
He accuses her of lying.
"It's not lies," Letby says.
Dr Alison Ventress records a note for Child H, timed 11.50pm. It begins 'Several episodes of desaturation in past 2 hours...1st one after gas taken...became agitated...' Sky News:
Mr Johnson says Letby told this information to Dr Ventress.
Letby says she did not know if she told her this information, she may have been present in the room.
Dr Ventress adds: 'Further episodes no change in HR recovered with bagging...[oxygen requirement down] to 30% between episodes'.
Letby denies "trying it on" or "falsely creating the impression to Dr Ventress that [Child H] had been having problems for a couple of hours."
LL: "No, I don't agree that it was false."
Mr Johnson says the notes (on the observation chart and Letby's nursing notes) don't match.
Letby agrees it's an "innocent coincidence" (as said by Mr Johnson).
An observation chart for Child H is shown for September 25-26. Letby is asked if the results show any concern up to midnight.
Letby: "This [the observations taken] reflects that specific moment in time" and says that chart shows no concerns, with all readings in the normal range.
Dr Ventress added in her 11.50pm note: '2nd chest drain advanced back in to 4cm as was almost out. Done prior to chest x-ray'. Mr Johnson says this was Dr Ravi Jayaram's x-ray.
Letby is asked why she had not noticed that. Letby says medical staff put drains in and managing them was not part of her nursing role.
She accepts she knew chest drains were more secure when stitched in rather than taped in. She says she was checking the chest drains. She denies removing the chest drain to cause a desaturation just after Child H's father left.
The prosecution claims Letby has falsified the medical notes for Child H after the fact, making it appear as if she was deteriorating before she collapsed in the early hours. Chester Standard:
"You were falsely creating the impression to the registrar, your friend, that Child H was a child who had been presenting problems over the proceeding hours," Nick Johnson, the prosecution barrister, says.
Child H's father left around midnight, so the prosecution claim he would have noticed if what was happening in Letby's nursing notes was the reality of the situation.
Letby refutes this.
Child H had chest drains inserted and Letby has previously said their insertion, and how they were secured, may have contributed to the infant's problems, and collapse later that shift.
"Why were you not checking the drains?" Mr Johnson asks.
"I was checking the drains," Letby says.
"Because you removed the drain," Mr Johnson says.
"No," says Letby.
"And that is the reason why Child H desaturated just before midnight just after her father left," Mr Johnson says.
"No," says Letby.
"Because you were sabotaging Child H that night, weren't you?" Mr Johnson says.
"No," says Letby.
Mr Johnson asks about Letby's error, as mentioned in her evidence, about the timing of the blood transfusion being completed. Letby said on May 15 the '0200 blood transfusion completed' should be 3am.
Letby says she has "miswritten" it from looking at the charts.
A blood infusion therapy chart is shown, in Letby's writing, which has in the time ended column what appears to be '0205' corrected to '0305'.
NJ: "The same mistake in two different places?"
Letby says she "couldn't say with clarity" adjusting the time after she had written her nursing notes.
NJ: "What happened after 0305?"
LL: "I don't recall."
NJ: "Really?...[Child H] had a cardiac arrest."
Letby is asked "how on earth" she made the 0205 error.
LL: "Because we're human people, we make mistakes."
Letby says the error is "mine" on the nursing notes, but the timings were otherwise accurate.
Letby says she cannot remember Child H's father being present.
The father recalled "mottling running out of her skin towards her fingers".
Letby says she agrees there was mottling on Child H's skin, but not that it was moving.
A blood gas chart for September 26 is shown to the court for Child H.
Letby agrees the reading at 6.44am is a "good" blood gas reading.
Mr Johnson says Child H had had a "miraculous recovery".
Letby: "Yes."
NJ: "Were you pleased?"
LL: "Of course I was pleased."
NJ: "Or were you frustrated that you had failed in your attempt to kill her?
LL: "No."
The second event is being discussed. For the night of September 26-27, Lucy Letby was the designated nurse for two babies in room 2. Nurse Christopher Booth was the designated nurse for Child G in room 2, and Nurse Shelley Tomlins was the designated nurse for Child H in room 1.
Elizabeth Marshall is the designated nurse for four babies in room 3, including Child I.
The court hears a seriously ill baby was brought into the unit during the night.
The court hears Letby, in her evidence to defence on May 15, said she did not have much to do with Child H on the night shift.
Letby said she was reliant on medical notes as she did not recall "with any great detail" that night for Child H.
Dr Matthew Neame was the registrar that night, with Dr Jessica Scott the night SHO.
Letby accepts she had got "confused" in her defence statement between the events of this night and the previous night.
She rules out staffing levels as a contribution in Child H's deterioration.
She says she cannot comment on medical incompetencies as she was not Child H's designated nurse and was not present for much of the shift, and rules out a doctor or nurse making mistake(s).
Letby is asked if she was involved in an event timed 9.15pm for Child H, who had a desaturation and bradycardia. Letby said she did not remember.
Dr Neame, in evidence, said "ETT removed by nursing staff" and that nurse was Letby, alone.
LL: "Well I don't have any recollection of that."
A text is shown from Letby to a colleague at 9.51pm: "'I've been helping Shelley so least still involved but haven't got the responsibility..."
Letby says she "does not agree" she would have removed an ET Tube by herself.
The neonatal schedule shown for 9-10pm shows no duties for Child H for which Letby has been named as the nurse for it.
Letby is asked about what she had been helping Shelley with, as per her text message - she says she had been helping with Child H.
She denies taking an "opportunity" to "sabotage" Child H.
Nurse Shelley Tomlins' note for 9.45pm is shown:
The court is shown nurse Tomlin's notes for that shift, which include: '...around 2030 [Child H] had profound desat and brady, air entry no longer heard and capnography negative therefore ETT removed and Drs crashbleeped. New ETT sited...on second attempt...Copious secretions obtained via ETT and orally, blood stained.'
'2145 - Desaturation to 40% despite good air entry and positive capnography. ETT suctioned quickly with thick blood-stained secretions noted. [Child H] recovered quickly after...'
Letby denies altering Child H's ET Tube to cause bleeding.
Mr Johnson asks if Letby was "bored" with the children she was looking after in room 2 prior to Child H's collapse.
LL: "No."
She denies she had "time on her hands".
At 12.45am on September 27, Letby is recorded as 'liking' a post on Facebook. At 12.46am, she liked a Facebook photo posted by a colleague.
Letby says she may have been on her break at this point.
Mr Johnson says Letby was involved in a fluid balance chart for one of her designated babies around that time. Letby: "Yes, at 1am."
Child H's father's statement is read to the court, in which he said "Quite late on [Saturday, September 26]" he went to rest, and was woken up shortly afterwards and to get to Child H's bedside.
Letby denies using the time the father was away as an "opportunity" to attack Child H.
LL: "No, I've never attacked any child."
Letby says she "couldn't say" if she was covering for Shelley Tomlins at 1am.
An observation chart is shown for Child H for September 26-27. Hourly observations are made between 8pm and 4am, except for 1am.
Crash call bleep data is made at 1.04am and 1.06am for Child H.
Mr Johnson says Dr Neame gave evidence to say when he arrived, Letby was present.
NJ: "Is that right?"
LL: "I can't say, from memory."
NJ: "You were there, weren't you?"
LL: "I can't say exactly where I was, from memory."
Letby denies making an "alibi" at 1am for the fluid balance chart for her designated baby.
LL: "That's me giving cares to the baby I was allocated."
Nurse Shelley Tomlins' record, written at 3.49am, for the 3.30am desaturation: '0330 - profound desaturation to 60s, again requiring neopuffing with no known cause for desat....copious amounts of secretions yielded orally, pink tinged. Small amount of ET secretions gained, again pink tinged. Heart rate mainly nomral during desat. Recovered slowly.'
Letby denies "interfering with [Child H's] ET Tube".
Letby says she is helping Shelley Tomlins after the desaturation.
NJ: "Why is it always you that ends up in nursery room 1?"
LL: "I don't agree it is always me."
Mr Johnson moves on to the case of Child I. Sky News:
Letby agrees she remembers Child I "very well".
Mr Johnson says this is "another case where you falsified [her records]."
Letby is asked to look at her defence statement. She said Child I's stomach "bloated...regularly" and "all the nursing staff" were aware of it.
Letby said "nothing was ever done" about the concerns with Child I's bowel. Letby said she was one of those raising concerns, that she "was not getting the treatment she needed".
The defence statement adds Letby did recall one handover, to nurse Bernadette Butterworth, that Child I desaturated and became apnoeic, and she assisted in care thereafter.
Nick Johnson, for the prosecution, is now reading out a statement Letby previously made to the court, in which she said 'I didn't look after Child I a great deal.' Chester Standard:
Letby also previously told the court many of the incidents took place while she was off shift.
Letby, when asked, rules out staffing levels as a problem that led to Child I's deterioration on September 30. Sky News:
For September 30, Letby was looking after Child I and two other babies in room 3 on her long day shift.
Letby rules out medical incompetencies or mistakes made by medical staff that led to Child I's collapse on September 30.
Letby is asked to look at Child I's medical records from September 26-29, and observations early on Letby's shift on September 30.
Letby agrees Child I was stable at this time.
A temperature of 36.1C is recorded for Child I at 11am, and the 'hot cot' temperature was turned up.
Letby denies by this time she had "fallen out" with medical colleagues Ashleigh Hudson, Melanie Taylor and one other.
The prosecution claims Letby only liked being in the highest dependency nursery (nursery one). Chester Standard:
"I liked being in all of the nurseries," Letby says when asked about this.
Nick Johnson, the prosecution barrister, then asks if she didn't like her new colleague on the unit.
"I don't agree with that," Letby says.
He says Letby had also fallen out with another colleague, who "wouldn't talk to you in the aftermath of [children A & B]."
The ward round posted a "positive picture" for Child I on September 30. Letby agrees.
Child I was due her immunisations, as noted on the ward round. Mr Johnson says this positive picture was similar to Child G, when Child G was about to have her immunisations.
Mr Johnson asks what became an obstacle to that. Letby replies it was Child I vomiting and having to be transferred to room 1.
A feeding chart is shown for Child I for September 30. Mum fed and gave cares at 10am. The note is signed by Letby.
At 1pm a 35mls feed was given via the NG Tube which had a 5ml aspirate. Letby says the 5ml aspirate "is a very minimal amount". At 4pm a further 35ml feed is given via the NG Tube. On both occasions Child I was asleep.
At 4.30pm - 'large vomit + apnoea -> N1' [transfer to nursery 1].
Letby is asked about Child I's mother's routine. Letby: "Not specifically..." she adds the mother would visit the unit regulary.
Mr Johnson suggests Letby knew the family so well through the frequent visits that she got to know their routine when they would be in and out of the unit. Letby: "I don't agree."
Dr Lisa Beebe's note showed she was asked to review Child I due to a low temperature.
The note adds: '...mum reports [low] temperature has been happening over past few days'.
The note concludes: '...monitor closely, if further concerns for sepsis, screen but appears clinically well at present'.
Letby says she does not recall the conversation. She does not recall, as the prosecution suggests, telling the doctor one concern[low temperature] and the mother another [abdomen].
She denies "providing a cover", and says she did "monitor her [Child I] closely", as noted on the doctor's plan.
Letby says she first monitored Child I's vital signs at 3pm. She said the concern raised with the doctor was Child I having a low temperature, and she had adjusted that by raising the hot cot temperature.
Mr Johnson suggests that "monitor closely" would mean more observations. Letby: "I disagree."
Letby is asked how long the 1pm 35ml feed with thickener, as listed on the chart, would take to administer. She agrees it would take "roughly" 15 minutes.
Letby's nursing note, written at 1.36pm is shown to the court: '...3x8 feeds ebm, 2bottles to 1NG Tube. abdomen appears full and slightly distended, soft to touch [Child I] straining++. Bowels have been opened. Mum feels it is more distended to yesterday and that [Child I] is quiet. Appears generally pale...Drs asked to review - to continue with current plan'
Letby says: "We monitor all our babies closely" in response to why Dr Beebe had said 'monitor closely' instead of 'do what you normally do'.
Mr Johnson: "This is yet another example of you writing nursing notes for something that didn't happen."
LL: "I don't agree."
Letby denies "cooking the notes" to show Child I was deteriorating prior to her collapse.
Prosecutor Nicholas Johnson KC is continuing to cross-examine Lucy Letby on the case of Child I.
An observation chart for Child I is shown for September 30. Hourly observations are made for 10am-1pm, and 3pm to the rest of the day.
Letby says there is "no reason" why the 2pm observation is not made.
Letby is asked which 'doctors' reviewed Child I at 3pm. Letby names one doctor and believes it was one doctor reviewed.
Mr Johnson says there is no medical note in relation to this.
Letby denies "making it up".
Mr Johnson asks Letby why the 'bottle-bottle-NGT' feed system is interrupted by 'bottle-NGT-NGT'.
Letby says the 4pm, 2nd NGT feed was as Child I was asleep.
Letby denies "lyingly" recording notes for when Child I had bowel movements during the day.
Mr Johnson says a doctor's notes do not note a prior examination. Letby denies making up the examination in her notes. She adds: "Just because it's [not there] doesn't mean it [didn't take place]."
Mr Johnson says Letby is "very keen" to raise doctor's mistakes with the likes of Dr Harkness and Dr Gibbs, but not in this case.
LL: "I don't believe this was noted at the time, my priority was [Child I], not medical notes."
NJ: "You force fed [Child I] didn't you?"
LL: "No, I didn't."
Letby says Child I did not wake for that feed, so an NGT feed was given as "standard practice".
Mr Johnson says "despite all the positive signs" for Child I, she vomited, just like Child G, and in both cases, Letby was there.
Letby says she does not recall if she was there when Child I vomited.
A medical report said Child I: "There is splinting of the diaphragm due to bowel distention..."
Letby denies "pumping" Child I full of milk or air.
Letby: "I fed [Child I] the normal dose of milk for her feed."
A blood gas chart for Child I is shown - the chart had not been noted up by Letby and it was found on a clipboard. It was signed by Bernadette Butterworth for Letby.
Letby says the chart was "not hidden - it was there for anyone to see."
Mr Johnson talks about the 7.30pm event for Child I.
Letby's notes add: 'At 1930 [Child I] became apnoeic, - abdomen distended++ and firm. Bradycardia and desaturation followed, SHO in attendance and registrar crash called....'Air++ aspirated from NG Tube...[Child I] is now very pale and quiet'.
Letby denies forcing air into Child I.
Observations for Child I in the remainder of September 30 are shown to the court.
Bernadette Butterworth's nursing note: 'During handover [Child I] abdo had become more distended and hard she had become apnoeic and bradycardiac and sats had dropped. IPPV given and despite a good seal with Neopuff there was still no chest movement, aspirated NGT air +++ and 2mls of milk obtained, eventually got chest movement and sats and heart rate normalised...'
Mr Johnson talks about the second event for Child I, which was on the night of October 12-13, when Letby said she was standing in the doorway when she could see Child I looked pale, and the lights were turned up.
Letby says the lighting was on in that room so Child I could be seen prior to the lights being turned up.
Letby is asked to look at her defence statement. She recalls Ashleigh Hudson was "quite inexperienced" to be looking after Child I.
Letby said Child I required "very close monitoring", and adds that, "looking back", Ashleigh had stopped monitoring her when she should have been.
Asked to explain where that instruction to monitor Child I came from, Letby says it was policy that Child I should have been monitored as she had come off antibiotics some time in the previous 48 hours.
Letby adds: "I'm not saying Ashleigh made a mistake."
The judge seeks clarification on 'monitoring'. Letby says it includes monitoring observations if a baby is on a monitor, but otherwise involves keeping an eye, regularly, on the baby.
Mr Johnson says there had been at least 48 hours since Child I had gone off antibiotics before the event occurred.
Letby is asked in what way Ashleigh Hudson was inexperienced.
LL: "I don't think Ashleigh had a lot of experience in recognising changes in babies, potentially."
Letby says the more experience you have, the more you can detect changes, such as changes in colour, in a baby.
Letby tells the court she does not recall a reason why she went into room 2 with Ashleigh Hudson.
In her defence statement, Letby said as they entered the room, they turned the light up on the light dimmer switch, and she saw Child I looking pale, and they went to assist. Child I was "gasping" and the alarm had not gone off.
Letby rules out staffing levels, medical incompetencies or staffing mistakes as a cause of Child I's desaturation on October 12-13.
A nursing shift rota is shown for October 12-13, with Lucy Letby in room 1, designated nurse for one baby. Ashleigh Hudson was designated nurse for three babies in room 2, including Child G and Child I.
Letby repeats there was no issue with staffing ratios to babies cared for, for that night.
Letby agrees with the evidence Ashleigh Hudson said that Child I was doing well - "prospering", and that the level of care had been scaled back.
Before the collapse, Child I was in air and on bottle feeds.
Letby says she has "no memory" if Ashleigh Hudson, as said in evidence, left room 2 to help colleague Laura Eagles in room 1.
Letby says she had a baby in room 1, and cannot recall who was to look after nursery 2.
In evidence, she said she was not the nurse called to room 2.
She tells she would have remembered having to hand over care of her baby and look after three babies in room 2.
Letby said "very quickly", she had noticed and saw Child I was pale. From Sky News:
Letby is asked why she was at room 2. She replies there was "nothing sinister" about that, that she had been in a chat with a colleague.
NJ: "The lights were off, weren't they?"
LL: "I can't say."
Letby is asked to look at her police interview.
In it, she says she had taken over Child I's care as Ashleigh Hudson had been "quite junior". For the observation of Child I, she replied the lights were off at night, and then they put the lights on, adding she could see Child I and: "I noticed that she was pale in the cot."
Letby, asked why she had told the jury the lights were "never off", says the lights are "never off completely", they are turned up.
A second police interview has Letby: "We put the light on - the lights aren't on in the nursery at night."
Asked why she did not refer to a dimmer switch in her police interview, Letby says: "I don't know."
NJ: "Are to trying to massage the evidence by [now] saying the lights were on low?"
LL: "No."
NJ: "What effect does going from a bright corridor [looking into] a [dark/dimly lit] room have?"
LL: "I don't know.
NJ: "You really don't know?"
LL: "No."
NJ: "Everybody knows, don't they?"
Letby says: "You wouldn't be able to see as well."
Mr Johnson says Letby was able to see "straight away" as she had caused Child I's deterioration.
LL: "No."
{The photo of the cot, as shown previously, is displayed.](https://www.chesterstandard.co.uk/resources/images/16400235.jpg?type=mds-article-642)
NJ: "Do you agree it is accurate?"
LL: "No...there would be more light visible. The cot would potentially be nearer to the light.
LL: "I think it was nearer to the workbench than that."
Mr Johnson asks how big Child I's hands would be - Letby says they would be small.
Mr Johnson says Child I would be almost entirely obscured.
LL: "Just her hands and her face."
NJ: "Which would be covered by that tentlike structure."
LL: "Not entirely no."
Mr Johnson asks how Letby could spot something Ashleigh Hudson could not, as mentioned from her police interview.
LL: "I had more experience so I knew what I was looking for - at."
NJ: "What do you mean looking 'for'?"
LL: "I don't mean it like that - I'm finding it hard to concentrate."
The judge, Mr Justice James Goss, says it "has been a long day" and the trial is adjourned for today.
The court is being shown an image of nursery two in a state of almost total darkness.The next court day scheduled will be for Tuesday, May 30.
Nick Johnson, the prosecution barrister, asks if this is an accurate representation of what it was like on 12/13 October, when Letby is alleged to have attacked Child I.
"No," says Letby.
The cot has a tent-like structure over it - Letby says this is to "minimise bright light" to the baby.
"There is almost nothing to see," Mr Johnson says.
"Just her hands and face," Letby replies.
"Which could have been covered by that tent-like structure," Mr Johnson says,
"Not entirely no," says Letby.
She refutes what a colleague previously said - the colleague said people "can't see anything" from that doorway.
'Maybe I spotted something that XX wasn't able to spot. The rooms are never that dark that you can't see the baby at all,' Letby previously said in a police interview.
She now says she had more experience "so knew what I was looking for".
"What do you mean by that," Mr Johnson asks.
There is silence as Letby refuses to answer the question.
Letby then says she is finding it "quite hard to concentrate on all of the dates".
The judge then concludes proceedings early, "having observed the witness" he says it has been a "long day" for Letby.
2023.05.01 17:23 lunasworldx The murder of the Kerry Babies
2023.04.23 18:32 ProfessionaIs (MM) Top Burmese military-linked election official has been assassinated in Myanmar
A top election official in Myanmar was fatally shot in his car in Yangon, the country's commercial capital, in the latest attack attributed to a group opposed to military rule.Al Jareeza (QA):
Sai Kyaw Thu, deputy director-general of the military-appointed Union Election Commission, was shot multiple times on Saturday (Apr 22), according to the military's information office, media reports and a statement of responsibility from an urban guerrilla group.
The information office on Sunday said that the attack was carried out by the People's Defence Force, the loosely organised armed wing of the pro-democracy National Unity Government, an underground group that opposes the military-installed government that was established when the army seized power two years ago.
Many opposition forces including local People's Defence Force groups operate autonomously from the National Unity Government, but the military labels them all as "terrorists".
A resistance group calling itself For The Yangon said that it carried out the attack on Sai Kyaw Thu, a former lieutenant colonel. It declared "Mission: Accomplished" in a Facebook post on Saturday evening that was illustrated with three photos of their target.
Sai Kyaw Thu is believed to be the most senior official of the Election Commission to be shot since the army seized power on Feb 1, 2021, from the elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi.
Urban guerrillas have carried out many targeted killings, acts of arson and small bombings. Victims included officials and members of the military and their associates, as well as people believed to be informers or military collaborators.
After {the military’s} takeover, the army clamped down harshly on opponents in the cities, arresting thousands and using deadly force even against non-violent demonstrators.
The repression, which has now accounted for more than 3,400 civilian deaths, triggered widespread armed resistance.
A member of guerrilla group said in a text message on Sunday that Sai Kyaw Thu was assassinated "for being the deputy director-general of the illegal election commission of the military council, which disrespected the votes of the people in 2020 general election and abused the people unjustly, and also for being the one who falsely prosecuted president Win Myint and Aung San Suu Kyi as an accessory of the military council".
”The one who insults the public will be punished by the people," said the member of {the guerrilla} group, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he fears arrest by the authorities.
The deputy head of Myanmar’s military-appointed election commission has been shot dead in the country’s commercial capital Yangon by rebels, authorities said, the latest killing of a high-profile individual linked to the country’s military rulers.
Sai Kyaw Thu, deputy director of the Union Election Commission, was killed in the township of Thingangyun in eastern Yangon on Saturday, the army’s information team said in a statement. Local media reported that he was shot multiple times in the chest, neck and head.
The army statement said that “People’s Defence Forces” were responsible for the killing but did not give further details.
The self-declared anti-coup People’s Defence Forces (PDF) — loosely-organised, armed wings of the country’s shadow National Unity Government (NUG) — have sprung up in opposition to the military which seized power more than two years ago, leading to social unrest and an economic crisis in the country.
The NUG was established by democratically-elected politicians who were removed from office in the military coup.
With Myanmar’s military continuing a bloody crackdown on dissent since seizing control of the country in 2021, PDF fighters have targeted officials known or perceived to be working with the military.
Military leaders had tasked the election commission with holding new polls, which opponents of the military say cannot possibly be free or fair.
The military removed Aung San Suu Kyi’s elected government in February 2021 after her party had trounced military-backed parties at elections in 1990, 2015 and 2020.
Across the country, there are almost daily killings of low-level officials working with the military or alleged informers. Bloody reprisals from the military often follow quickly.
The military’s power grab has also prompted renewed fighting with ethnic rebels and birthed dozens of other opposition groups now battling across the country.
2023.04.12 07:34 Beowulf_98 Someone died because of me [EMD]
2023.04.09 03:27 Designer-Emergency80 阮晓寰案件,你可以做的几件事——如何支持和声援被捕者【案例更新版】 NGOCN
2023.04.06 16:19 subredditsummarybot Your weekly /r/Comicbooks recap for the week of March 30 - April 05
score | comments | title & link |
---|---|---|
1,094 | 159 comments | Art appreciation: Humberto Ramos |
1,052 | 165 comments | What makes a good animated movie? |
729 | 239 comments | Teen Titans or Young Justice? |
score | comments | title & link |
---|---|---|
1,954 | 253 comments | Frauds tend to flee at the sight of a true aristocrat. (X-Men #21 2019) |
1,638 | 138 comments | The JLA team interacts with the JSA. (Justice League of America #8) |
944 | 29 comments | Batman sound effect in Hex #11 |
score | comments | title & link |
---|---|---|
499 | 8 comments | I drew eddie vs pete |
464 | 3 comments | Black Canary (Art by @andreayewon) |
300 | 7 comments | Batman is so badass |
score | comments | title & link |
---|---|---|
94 | 8 comments | A panorama of my completed Deadpool: All killer no filler collection (all 100 books) |
score | comments | title & link |
---|---|---|
2,430 | 28 comments | John Constantine by Charlie Gillespie |
1,501 | 32 comments | Gotham City: Year One #6 variant cover — Art by Jorge Molina |
652 | 11 comments | Batman by Alvaro Martínez Bueno |
score | comments | title & link |
---|---|---|
3,785 | 166 comments | [Movie/TV] Official Poster for ‘Secret Invasion’ |
2,401 | 63 comments | My first attempt at making a comic book in 1990 when I was age 12 |
2,381 | 691 comments | [Movie/TV] Jonathan Majors Arrest: Marvel Studios Reportedly 'Discussing Options' With Actor's Agent |
2,243 | 180 comments | [Question] Where is this from? And does Spider-Man have a big butt? |
2,198 | 425 comments | [Movie/TV] Blue Beetle – Official Trailer |
score/comments | awards | title & link |
---|---|---|
17 - 4 comments | 1 'MURICA | Captain America vs The Red Skull! A pretty cool Super8 short film from the 70's |
1,130 - 123 comments | 1 All-Seeing Upvote | This is my favorite Wolverine cover. Hands down! I’m thinking about turning it into a tufted rug! What do you think? 🤔 |
36 - 3 comments | 1 Gold | [Discussion] Dan Abnett reveals new ‘Groot’ miniseries details and a love of Marvel cosmic |
2023.04.05 13:18 derpedsohard American Fascism Is Becoming More Delusional — And More Dangerous
Republican lawmakers in Texas want to create a state security force to patrol the US-Mexico border that critics have characterised as a “vigilante death squad policy.” How bad does that sound? “The group would be comprised of law enforcement officers and civilians under the direction of a governor-selected chief. The members of the group would also be extended immunity from criminal prosecution relating to their actions on the border. They will be directed to “arrest, detain, and deter individuals crossing the border illegally including with the use of non-deadly force.” And: “If the case is challenged and successfully survives a Supreme Court ruling, it would change the way all border states could police the southern border.So Texas is creating a force of specially selected vigilantes, under the direction of a “chief” selected by the governor. The members of that “force,” which appears to have no checks or balances on it, will be able to use force in whatever way they like, against whomever they like — but also have immunity from its consequences. Think about how dire that really is for a second.
By 1923, the Nazi Party led by Adolf Hitler had created a small volunteer guard unit known as the Saal-Schutz (Hall Security) to provide security. The SS was regarded as the Nazi Party’s elite unit. In keeping with the racial policy of Nazi Germany, in the early days all SS officer candidates had to provide proof of Aryan ancestry back to 1750 and for other ranks to 1800. Once the war started and it became more difficult to confirm ancestry, the regulation was amended to just proving the candidate’s grandparents were Aryan, as spelled out in the Nuremberg Laws. Other requirements were complete obedience to the Führer and a commitment to the German people and nation. In 1936, Himmler wrote in the pamphlet “The SS as an Anti-Bolshevist Fighting Organization”: “We shall take care that never again in Germany, the heart of Europe, will the Jewish-Bolshevik revolution of subhumans be able to be kindled either from within or through emissaries from without.” As part of its race-centric functions during World War II, the SS oversaw the isolation and displacement of Jews from the populations of the conquered territories, seizing their assets and deporting them to concentration camps and ghettos, where they were used as slave labor or immediately killed.Got all that? So now we’re seeing the rise of institutions which parallel textbook fascist ones, like the…SS. Volunteer paramilitaries, explicitly devoted to protecting the Homeland from hated subhumans. It hardly takes a genius to see the parallels, how disturbing they are, or where all this ends.
If he’s afraid, Sheriff Mike Chitwood doesn’t show it. With his gold star badge on his chest, he cuts a defiant figure as he discusses the death threat he recently received. Sheriff Chitwood, 59, went viral earlier this month after he called out a far-right group that has been harassing Jewish people in Orlando, Florida. Orlando has been hit by a rash of antisemitic incidents, with Florida becoming, according to one expert, “ground zero for the extreme right-wing”. Jewish residents in the area have been harassed and hounded by the far-right and have woken up to find antisemitic leaflets left on their doorsteps. Among the incidents that first prompted Sheriff Chitwood to take a stance was the harassment of worshippers outside an Orlando synagogue in February. The group later posted footage online. In it a man is seen standing outside the synagogue wearing a Hawaiian shirt and sunglasses; a string of garlic hangs around his neck. He raises his arm in the chilling slant of the Nazi salute, grins at the camera and praises Hitler. “This is a neo-Nazi ideology on display,” Sheriff Chitwood said in a news conference that has been watched around the world. Speaking to Sky News, he warned that extremist groups “need to be kept in check” because there is a risk that someone hearing their rhetoric gets indoctrinated and goes out and commits a mass shooting. Last week, a 38-year-old man from New Jersey, who police say made an anonymous online threat to kill the sheriff due to his stand against the group, was arrested at his mother’s house.I highly recommend reading the whole article. But let me first summarize it, and then unpack its meaning. There’s a Sherriff in Florida — a brave one — who’s taking a stand against rising Neo-Nazism. Neo-Nazism that goes out there and terrorizes Jews, performing Nazi salutes. For warning the Nazis off? The Sherriff himself has become their target. Think about how chilling this story is. How DeSantis’s wink-and-a-nod to fanatics and lunatics — his open empowerment and embrace of them — more or less licenses all this. This is top-down fascism becoming bottom-up fascism.
2023.03.30 01:06 10marketing8 FTX founder Bankman-Fried charged with paying $40M bribe
2023.03.15 07:33 subreddit_stats Subreddit Stats: SantaBarbara top posts from 2022-03-14 to 2023-03-14 04:50 PDT
Submissions | Comments | |
---|---|---|
Total | 1000 | 23686 |
Rate (per day) | 2.74 | 64.88 |
Unique Redditors | 439 | 3158 |
Combined Score | 62820 | 131957 |
Generated with BBoe's Subreddit Stats
2023.03.06 22:32 RetardHolder *Bonk* - Die Aktienschau zum 06.03.2023 - Ausgabe Nr. 307
![]() | Guten Abend liebe Affengemeinde! submitted by RetardHolder to u/RetardHolder [link] [comments] https://preview.redd.it/b45f63nos6ma1.jpg?width=517&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=14e0d9fba5e14cc885ce22f42a201b8645382042 Der heutige Handelstag brachte unserer Lieblingsaktie ein Minus von 0,16 %, womit sie bei 18,67 USD schließen musste. Über den Tag wurden 2,7 Mio. Aktien gehandelt. yahoo Die Heatmap zeigt uns für heute vorwiegend Verlierer. Am besten lief es für die südamerikanischen Märkte. finviz Auf den Krypomärkten ging es ebenfalls bergab. Die meisten gängigen Kurse verloren bis zu 3 % ihres Wertes. Die deutlichste Ausnahme ist TMG mit 14 % Verlust. coin360 Das RRP Update zeigt uns für heute einen Wert von 2.190,8 Mrd. USD mit 101 Gegenparteien.
Das sollte alles Wesentliche für den Tag gewesen sein. Sollte es sonst noch Erwähnenswertes geben, von dem ich nichts mitbekommen habe, schreibt es gerne hier in die Kommentare. Ich werde versuchen, den Beitrag gegebenenfalls zu ergänzen. Schlaft gut meine Affen, bis zum nächsten Mal! u/Crazy-Ad-7869 |
2023.02.24 15:31 Clear-Top6340 Leftovers content! Most insane video I’ve seen in a while
2023.02.19 16:05 FlubbedPig WoolieVersus Playlist Corrections (Feb 2023)
Dokapon Journey [Playlist]The following videos are in the Castle Super Beast playlist twice: "Project Winter" Clip, "Death of the Author" Clip, Out Now! CSB 113, Out Now! CSB 130, and Out Now! CSB 133.
Elden Ring [Playlist]
Woolie VS TEPPEN [Playlist]
Woolie VS One-offs [Playlist]
Let’s Watch [Playlist]
- Dump All Souls Into Poyo Kirby and the Forgotten Land (Demo)
- Youngling Combo Lab is OPEN Lego Star Wars Skywalker Saga
Woolie VS Twitch Hightlights [Playlist]
Woolie Will Figure It Out [Playlist]
- Kirby is Self Care Charity Stream (1/2)
- SUFFERING IS YOU Charity Stream (2/2)
- Twitch Rivals: Team Max vs Team Woolie Highlights
Get Into Fighting Games [Playlist]
Announcements [Playlist]
Cons & Panels [Playlist]
Castle Super Beast [Playlist]
- Woolie vs Faygo
- Eyepatch Wolf & Woolie present: Tournament of Dreams: Full Guttural Carnage
- Woolie vs Kenny 2: Dreadment Day
Miscellaneous [Playlist Unclear]
- Castle Super Beast Clips: Childhood Kumite!
- Riot’s $100M Settlement Castle Super Beast Clips
- Pokemon Arceus: Pretty Fun For a PS2 Game Castle Super Beast Clips
- “I Can’t Help It, I Love Making Poison Swamps” Castle Super Beast Clips
- A I The Somnium Files Is A Strand Game Castle Super Beast Clips
- “You Think You’re John Halo?” Castle Super Beast Clips
- Best Berfs Castle Super Beast Clips
- Multiversus Is Legit Castle Super Beast Clips
- FF6 In Retrospect Castle Super Beast Clips
- Nioh 2 Has Created Mind Gnomes Castle Super Beast Clips
- So Your DM Is A Sociopath Castle Super Beast Clips
- Game Genres Are The Dumbest Castle Super Beast Clips
- FF6 In Retrospect Castle Super Beast Clips
- Learn About Juneteenth, Courtesy of Halo Infinite Castle Super Beast Clips
- The Best Sidearm in Games Castle Super Beast Clips
- Why Do People Like Precise Timing in Games Castle Super Beast Clips
- Dragon's Dogma: Best 7/10 ever made Castle Super Beast Clips
- Final Fantasy Intergatcha Castle Super Beast Clips
- Fossil Dated Gaming Trends Castle Super Beast Clips
- Kiting With The Limiters Off Castle Super Beast Clips
- The Sketchy Parts of Outsourced QA Castle Super Beast Clips
- This Game Contains Traces of Horny Castle Super Beast Clips
- The Good Kind of Pants Problem Castle Super Beast Clips
- 23&Me: Orange Is The New Black Castle Super Beast Clips
- STADIA CLAPS BACK Castle Super Beast Clips
- Period Appropriate Corporate Plantation Slave Castle Super Beast Clips
- Exoprimal Quitters Castle Super Beast Clips
- The Algorithm Strikes Back: React Andy Arc Castle Super Beast Clips
- NO AIRBAG! WE DIE LIKE MEN! Castle Super Beast Clips
- Lysandre? or Lysandre? Castle Super Beast Clips
- Hardest Part Of Modding Black People Out Of FO4 Is Finding Voice Actors Castle Super Beast Clips
- The first Disco Elysium like Castle Super Beast Clip
- Assassin's Greed Castle Super Beast Clips
- Mamma Mia Castle Super Beast Clips
- Hey it's your guy, Mario Castle Super Beast Clips
- Chainsaw Knife Parries! Castle Super Beast Clips
- Sonic Frontiers vs 3D Sonic Games Castle Super Beast Clips
- Clap Of The Eye Castle Super Beast Clips
- Panda Stomps On Smash, Nintendo Sips Wine And Joins In Castle Super Beast Clips
- Podcast is out! "CSB 010: My Youthful Soul Is Filled With Bitch"
- Out Now! CSB 147: The Tyranny of King Andrew The Unperspiring
- Out Now! CSB 148: Fortnite Strats: Gentrify The Map
- Out Now! CSB 149: Nightmare Philadelphia Kabedon
- Out Now! CSB 150: Wholesome! 3rd Streich
- Out Now! CSB 151: Monk Dip Your Dirge Bard While You Soak
- Out Now! CSB 152: His Swamping Will Not Be Stopped
- Out Now! CSB 153: Calculator Incognito Mode
- Out Now! CSB 154: Undefeated HBO Titty
- Out Now! CSB 155: Boo Hoo I’m Immortal
- Out Now! CSB 156: It’s Not 4 Hours Of Elden Ring Talk
- Out Now! CSB 157: Stadian’s End: Rise Of The LUNAtics
- Out Now! CSB 158: The Nutting Company: A Vac-Bed of Flesh
- Out Now! CSB 159: Bully 2: Now With Magic
- Out Now! CSB 160: Out On A High Note
- Out Now! CSB 161: Quebexodus
- Out Now! CSB 162: Aerial Rave The Younglings To Reach New Heights
- Out Now! CSB 163: Hyperchunnelling
- Out Now! CSB 164: At Some Point The Title Will Just Become Fartfartbabybarf
- Out Now! CSB 165: Was Red Ash The First NFT?!
- Out Now! CSB 166: Boobs&Butts RPG: Find Out What It Means To Be Born
- Out Now! CSB 167: I’m A Rare Shiny Black
- Out Now! CSB 168: I’m Starting To Morb
- Out Now! CSB 169: WINDOWS 11 GO DIE
- Out Now! CSB 170: Shepard Sticking Just The Tip Into A Mass Accelerator
- Out Now! CSB 171: SUGE NORTED
- Out Now! CSB 172: FF7 ReGackted
- Out Now! CSB 173: Pro-Skubbers Say Hydrossity
- Out Now! CSB 174: Muppets: The First VTubers
- Out Now! CSB 175: Four Billboards Outside Of Balmung
- Out Now! CSB 176: To Die On a Hill Named Altria
- Out Now! CSB 177: Cute Cat Game is More Cyberpunk Than Cyberpunk feat. Ludvig Forssell
- Out Now! CSB 178: Smug Carth Black Carth Fantasy Carth Carthn't
- Out Now! CSB 179: You Can't Pretend North America Doesn't Look Like a Dragon Dinosaur
- Out Now! CSB 180: The React Andy Arc
- Out Now! CSB 181: Our Lucky Fallout 4 Modder Will Grant Us 3 Wishes
- Out Now! CSB 182: Sugiyama's Quest! Episode 4: LGBT Who?
- Out Now! CSB 183: HK-47 is the Anti-Littlest Hobo
- Out Now! CSB 184: The Final Slur
- Out Now! CSB 185: Sidetalkin with Goatse
- Out Now! CSB 186: Distance From Irvine CA Ethnicity Tier List
- Out Now! CSB 187: Beta Codes For Beta Males
- Out Now! CSB 188: Capcom Enforced Foot Fetish
- Out Now! CSB 189: The Moon of Mahaa-Kalaa Hour: A Borneshaming Podcast
- Out Now! CSB 190: ATTENTION BAYONUTTERS: Are You Town? feat. @TheSphereHunter
- Out Now! CSB 191: Bin Laden's Laptop Connects Anime To 911
- Out Now! CSB 192: Burn Down Your Ass Groove
- Out Now! CSB 193: Doomnutters Rise Up
- Out Now! CSB 194: The R in Racism Stands For Racism
- Out Now! CSB 195: Betray Your Nation For A Fat Nut
- Out Now! CSB 196: Scam & Flow
- Out Now! CSB 197: Nooo You Don't Understand, My Wi-Fi Is The Good Wi-Fi
- Out Now! CSB 198: Arrested For Dark Patterns
- Out Now! CSB 199: BmC: Scroteguard The Baton Pass feat. TheSphereHunter
- Out Now! CSB 200: Julius Caesar: The First Roman Cancel
- Out Now! CSB 201: Why Is GURPS That It Is Made Noise Now?
- Out Now! CSB 202: X-Files Blackula Will Drain All Your Black
- Out Now! CSB 203: The Feds Will Never Defeat War Thunder Forum Clout
- Out Now! CSB 204: Guitar Nero
- Out Now! CSB 205: Ja Rule's Squid Game: Finally A Faithful Netflix Adaptation
2023.02.13 13:16 palaanna_201150 REDEVELOPMENT-11
2023.02.12 16:00 _call-me-al_ [Sun, Feb 12 2023] TL;DR — Crypto news you missed in the last 24 hours on Reddit
2023.02.06 14:40 meem09 What's your biggest "Oh man, I can't believe I didn't realize that!"-moment?
From the day of the Count’s house arrest, the chapters advance by a doubling principal: one day after arrest, two days after, five days, ten days, three weeks, six weeks, three months, six months, one year, two years, four years, eight years, and sixteen years after arrest. At this midpoint, a halving principal is initiated with the narrative leaping to eight years until the Count’s escape, four years until, two years, one year, six months, three months, six weeks, three weeks, ten days, five days, two days, one day and finally, the turn of the revolving door.I had completely missed that structure and thought it just randomly went were that author wanted it to. I already liked the book and was very impressed by the style, but this added information impressed me even more.
2023.02.05 17:00 IrinaSophia Saint Agatha the Virgin-Martyr (February 5th)
2023.02.05 16:57 IrinaSophia Saint Agatha the Virgin-Martyr (February 5th)
2023.01.28 05:41 -en- @BBCWorld: President Biden says 'image of America' at stake after the country watches Tyre Nichols arrest video https://t.co/kQaK8edjvD
submitted by -en- to newsbotbot [link] [comments]
2023.01.21 22:14 Chas-- (9) Space, Astronomy, and Cosmology: Based On the Tiniest Amount of Data Requires Great Heaps and Leaps of Faith [and a little Cosmic Music]
![]() | When I was young, I worked with an astronomer in a research lab who has since passed away, and this is where I learned that the very best mathematicians are astronomers: they deal with tiny amounts of data, sometimes just the variation in intensity over time of a single point or digital pixel, called a light curve. From that tiny pixel-history datum and a trick bag of brilliant mathematical methods, we have cosmology, the study of the evolution of the universe. submitted by Chas-- to SGIWhistleblowersMITA [link] [comments] This fellow was the nicest guy and a very unpretentious Southern Baptist, completely undeterred by the collision of cosmology and creationism, which allowed him to work easily with a group of mostly non-religious physicists. I'll give you some examples of the skills he fostered in the group from some of the things I learned there. His enormous set of mathematical skills lifted the entire group into some amazing discoveries. (1) I was having trouble using a Gaussian Elimination (GE) code to invert a square matrix to do least squares fits to convert data points into a polynomial equation in x. The code kept blowing up and creating goofy curves from the data points, even though the matrices were not singular (not having a zero matrix determinant.) The group looked at it and said the problem was that this GE matrix inversion would at a certain point in the algorithm require subtracting very large floating point numbers and this would wipe out the precision of the mantissa of the difference (minuend minus subtrahend equals the difference). They suggested that I should scale the matrix down, by finding the largest and smallest value, and linearly scale the whole thing down to a matrix with values running from 0.0 to 1.0. Then after inverting the matrix you could linearly scale it back to the original scale and that would work for two reasons (1) inverting a matrix is a linear operation, so linearly scaling (with an additive offset to make the smallest value zero and then a multiplier to make the largest value one) would not affect Gaussian Elimination , and (2) a large scale factor affects the exponent of a large number much more and much less the precision of the mantissa in the final difference. This worked like a charm and I never had any plot blow up after that. (2) My astronomer friend set me to do a Monte Carlo analysis for passive radon detectors that were small rectangular metal boxes with Lexan or CR-39 plastic on the inside. He had noticed something unusual related to the geometry, and wanted me to discover it on my own (he was my mentor.) Radium-226 has a half-life of 1.602 years and exists naturally in uranium and even coal mines. When it decays radioactively throwing off an alpha particle (a naked helium nucleus) it turns into Radon-222 with a shorter half-life of 3.8 days and floats up in certain areas into houses and other places in proximity of the Radium source. Radon is a noble gas that has completely filled electron shells (like all of the noble gases on the right end of the periodic table) and is thus not chemically active at all, it is what they call inert. So, it floats through solid matter, like rock and there is always a vapor pressure of it anywhere close to those localities in the earth. In those places, there is also always a vapor pressure of Radon-222 in your lungs, and some of that is going to decay at a relatively constant rate. When it does, it loses another alpha particle and becomes a chemically active radical Polonium-218 (half-life of 3.1 minutes) inside your lung and sticks to the first surface it touches. Where it sticks, is where the rest of the Radon-222 decay chain.PNG) irradiates that tiny spot of your lung. Radon is one of the leading causes of lung cancer across the globe. BTW, Polonium-210, from that decay chain with a half-life of 138 days, was one of President Putin's favorite poisons, requiring a centrifuge to separate out Bismuth-210 in a very dirty manufacturing process from spent control rods in nuclear reactors, and then injecting neutrons and separating the output again in a centrifuge. The handling of Polonium-210 is quite deadly, it triggers Geiger counters in a very noisy way, so the assassins that deliver it are likely to become ill. Nowadays, President Putin's assassins use neurotoxins that are less easy to detect. Anyway, my astronomer friend said the charged Polonium-218 particles would plate out evenly across the entire inner Lexan surface of the rectangular detector. All I had to do in the Monte Carlo analysis was traverse the surfaces of the inner rectangular solid with tiny squares and do ray tracing by randomly picking a spherical angle vector (what they call steradians of which there are 4 pi of solid angle out of every point) that a decay chain particle would shoot out from the decay, not weighting the decay chain for alphas, betas and gammas that might come out of that one sticky point. Then just keeping it simple and showing the pattern of where particles hit and counting the hits up, using the same tiny squares as receivers, seeing the pattern of which ones were hit from the tiny squares emitting throughout the detector box. Then do multiple runs with smaller and smaller squares until the results converge and see what the patterns were. When I was stumped, I asked, how do I handle the half of the radiation going down into the surface of the Lexan? He said that would be a constant of half of all the radiation coming out of that tiny square (2 pi of the solid angle) and you would add that on every pass through that square as an emitter. The way that he kept it simple and doable, but still mathematically relevant and scientific, was the magic of his astronomy-trained mathematical method. I assumed from the start that the centers of 2 large sides of the rectangular box, since they were facing each other, would show the greatest fluence (hits per cross section surface of radiated material) for the detector. In fact, the big flat sides were the least radiated. The eight corners of the box were the most radiated and vastly so, because the corners get it from three sides in close proximity. The physicists had assumed this effect was from the chemical development of the Lexan samples, but he spotted the geometry as an issue without ever seeing the measurement data that bore out this result. It also explains why radon is so deadly, the little pockets of your lung are where your breathed oxygen is absorbed, called alveoli. They are tiny spherical shapes, which the corners of the radon detector was modeling, unbeknownst even to my mentor. The surface elements in the alveoli get the same amount of plating out of Radon-222 daughter radicals as every other surface element in the lung gets, but they get enhanced radiation from the close proximity of the surrounding alveoli spherical surface. ...the isotopes 214Po and 218Po are thought to cause the majority of the estimated 15,000–22,000 lung cancer deaths in the US every year that have been attributed to indoor radon_effects). Tobacco smoking causes additional exposure to polonium.If you live in an area where radon is an issue, get yourself a cheap digital radon detector. If you have old watches and clocks with radium dials that glow in the dark produced before 1970? Get rid of them. (3) Another example on a more fundamental point regarding data analysis generally that he taught me: image analysis always reduces the information content of an image. It might bring out details so you can see them as in NASA processed images from the Webb telescope, but the raw data is the golden data and not just for images, for everything. So when they focus down and sharpen up a blurry image to get a license number in those procedural police dramas? They just fuzz up an image and play that back in reverse, it's all make-believe. In real life, don't trust that number: making it look like a digit you can read, likely changes the number. So, if you want to really learn the practice of computing and data analysis, hang out with astronomers, they are the very best at it. Astronomers have changed our view of the universe, and how we plan to live in it is molded by that and requires faith: I would argue that will ultimately turn out to be faith in the Lotus Sutra, but we will get to that. CopernicusNicolaus Copernicus replaced the Aristotelian/Ptolemaic geocentric view (earth at the center of the universe) with the heliocentric view (sun at center)[Copernicus] formulated a model of the universe that placed the Sun rather than Earth at its center. In all likelihood, Copernicus developed his model independently of Aristarchus of Samos, an ancient Greek astronomer who had formulated such a model some eighteen centuries earlier.Copernicus delayed for decades publishing heliocentric views he formed in 1514 (the Reformation effectively came into prominence with the excommunication of Martin Luther in 1520), probably out of fearing the wrath of the Inquisition, that Galileo later faced. Copernicus' work was submitted for him by a printer named Rheticus in 1542: While Rheticus initially supervised the printing, he had to leave Nuremberg before it was completed, and he handed over the task of supervising the rest of the printing to a Lutheran theologian, Andreas Osiander.This view of data-driven science by a Lutheran theologian has stood the test of time. There is a lot more going on there, than just Occam's Razor. GalileoGalileo Galilei's advances in astronomy (moon as planetary in 1609, the 3 Galilean satellites or moons of Jupiter in 1610, the phases of Venus like the Lunar phases in 1610, the rings of Saturn in 1610, which he thought were planets and Neptune in 1612 and that the Milky Way was not a gaseous nebula, but was in fact composed of many stars) were driven by his mastery of making telescopes, which production and sale to merchants fueled his research. Galileo held onto many spurious views like the Sun powering the tides of Earth, already well understood by Kepler, and also that stars were round and that their diameters could be observed directly.Opposition to heliocentrism and Galileo's writings on it combined religious and scientific objections. Religious opposition to heliocentrism arose from biblical passages implying the fixed nature of the Earth.In Italy after the Reformation and the reaction of the Roman Curia to it was gaining steam: Galileo defended heliocentrism based on his astronomical observations of 1609. In December 1613, the Grand Duchess Christina of Florence confronted one of Galileo's friends and followers, Benedetto Castelli, with biblical objections to the motion of the Earth. Prompted by this incident, Galileo wrote a letter to Castelli in which he argued that heliocentrism was actually not contrary to biblical texts, and that the Bible was an authority on faith and morals, not science.Galileo was sentenced by the Inquisition in 1633, for having heretical views, to imprisonment and quickly commuted to house arrest for the remainder of his life, with a total ban on his publications. KeplerJohannes Kepler observed the Supernova of 1604 at the age of 33, which as an Astrologer, he erroneously believed fit a deterministic Calvinist historical pattern. Although he began as a Copernican, "Kepler calculated and recalculated various approximations of Mars's orbit using an equant (the mathematical tool that Copernicus had eliminated with his system), eventually creating a model that generally agreed with Tycho's observations to within two arcminutes (the average measurement error). But he was not satisfied with the complex and still slightly inaccurate result; at certain points the model differed from the data by up to eight arcminutes."From Kepler's studies of various Platonic solids and polyhedra he came up with a pattern approximating the orbital periods of the six known planets around the sun. That led to his 3 laws of planetary motion: (First, in 1604) all planets move in ellipses, with the Sun at one focus, (Second, in 1602) planets sweep out equal areas in equal times and (Third, in 1618) The square of the periodic times are to each other as the cubes of the mean distances. As Copernican books were banned by Catholic Church in 1560, he had to publish his Epitome Astronomiae Copernicanae as a less readable text, just for experts only. [That Inquisitors and other Philistines are weak mathematicians, is the faulty presumption underlying that ruse.] HubbleEdwin Powell Hubble discovered galaxies, the expanding universe, which led to a big bang cosmology that he was unconvinced of personally.Edwin Hubble's arrival at Mount Wilson Observatory, California, in 1919 coincided roughly with the completion of the 100-inch (2.5 m) Hooker Telescope, then the world's largest. At that time, the prevailing view of the cosmos was that the universe consisted entirely of the Milky Way Galaxy.As alternate views of cosmology failed to match the evidence over the decades, Hubble's discoveries eventually led to the view of the universe as more or less constantly expanding from a big bang in the past (13.787±0.020 billion years ago, as of 2019), but Hubble himself did not believe at the time that the observations supported an expanding universe cosmology or a big bang cosmogeny. Perlmutter, Schmidt and RiessSaul Perlmutter, Brian P. Schmidt, Adam G. Riess recently discovered the accelerating expansion of the universe, due some unknown force called Dark Energy.In a 1998 study led by Adam Riess, the High-Z Team became the first to publish evidence that the expansion of the Universe is accelerating (Riess et al. 1998, AJ, 116, 1009, submitted March 13, 1998, accepted May 1998).This wonderful website has an excellent description and graph showing of the expansion rate of the universe, exceeding the speed of light by quite a bit. I have used a tool from Sourceforge.net called Graph_Data_Extractor (a truly wonderful tool) that allows you to steal data from graphs on the screen, with careful pointing and clicking on the curves. Stealing copyrighted images is illegal, but it's open season on the data points on published graphs. In the graph below you can see where we would be if the continued deceleration of the cosmos had not been interrupted by a sharp acceleration inflection about five billion years ago. The galaxies would be screaming towards us. What goes up must come down, unless someone fires the rocket motor! https://preview.redd.it/p6sticfupgda1.jpg?width=827&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f1f8599243df91cacade8961feee4475a140ad70 Observational skepticism explanations of dark energy have generally not gained much traction among cosmologists. For example, a paper that suggested the anisotropy of the local Universe has been misrepresented as dark energy[Colin; Mohayaee; Rameez; Sakar: 2019] was quickly countered by another paper claiming errors in the original paper.[Rubin; Heitlauf: 2020] Another study questioning the essential assumption that the luminosity of Type Ia supernovae does not vary with stellar population age[Yonsei: 2020][Kang: 2020] was also swiftly rebutted by other cosmologists.[Gohd: 2020]As you can see from the above, astronomers can have serious battles going on for decades until a tiny amount of data produced from decades of suffering constructing big experiments: clears away the facts from the fiction. What is Dark Energy?Its effect is the accelerating expansion of the universe, but that does not reflect on the causality of all that. Sir Roger Penrose of Oxford University, UK, received the Noble Prize in Physics for his studies of general relativity of black hole formation (with Stephen Hawking, who died before the prize was awarded.) He has given talks relating dark energy with, of all things, entropy. He hasn't made any claims for what dark energy is, however, I will make that claim for him, and much more than that.There are some equations for entropy, which is quantified by the variable S: Ludwig Boltzmann showed that statistical thermodynamic entropy in an isolated system is proportional to the number of microstates of the system: S = kB log Ω Claude Shannon later derived the same effective equation from information theory using W as the number of microstates: H = k log(W) Order and disorder (also called chaos) were expressed in relation to Shannon entropy by thermodynamic physicist Peter Landsberg of the University of Southampton in two equations showing that order and disorder edge each other out : Disorder = (Capacity for disorder of the system / Shannon's channel capacity) Order = 1 - (Capacity for order of the system / Shannon's channel capacity) John von Neumann described entropy in quantum statistical mechanics, with the trace function as the sum of the elements of the main diagonal of a square matrix (which I learned how to invert without blowing it up!): S = -kB Tr(ρ log ρ) So, they all agree that the greater the number of arrangements of the system, the greater the entropy, and Landsberg showed that order has fewer numbers of arrangements of the system, which makes sense: a troop of soldiers marching in step have fewer choices for individual movement for each soldier and that is a demonstration of order at the expense of personal freedom of choice. In his two hour talk called A Fork in the Road to Reality, Sir Roger talks at length about dark energy being the accelerating expansion of the universe and describes the unusual nature of it: (1) it took off with a major inflection 5 billion years ago (just before our local star started to burn hot) and (2) our local group of galaxies and in fact, all galactic clusters are not receding from each other internally, the great heaps of space are being inserted between the galactic clusters externally. Then he starts to talk about the universe as finite in size and an isolated system, subject to entropy and its equations. This has always made sense to me, since it started out at a single point ~13.7 billion years ago. [If the universe were infinite in size now it would have had to expand at infinite velocity, which didn't happen. It's transfinite, which means enormous, but not infinite, maybe thousands of times bigger than our visible universe so that it appears to be flat. And there is just no evidence now or forthcoming for the multiverse or many worlds, that is just science fantasy.] Finally, Sir Roger shows a picture of a gas in a small space, and what it would look like if you made the space bigger and kept the same gas particles, by inserting space between them. In fact, making the box bigger increases the entropy of the system dramatically. Thinking of entropy as the log of the number of the states of the system: (1) with more space there are more possible arrangements of the system of gas particles, (2) gas particles have greater mean free path, before they knock into each other: so they are less confined in terms of location. I am going to make three claims, A through C. What the Nobel Laureate (arguably the greatest physicist and mathematician still alive) does not claim in his video (in his humble and cautious manner) is that the increase of entropy occurring in our closed and finite system of the cosmos is driving the creation of space in the regions between galaxies, clusters and super-clusters. This is what, in my opinion, I am claiming: (1) that the increasing entropy in terms of disorder is being driven by the system maintaining a kind of balance between order and disorder, (2) that the order being created during the big bang synthesis of particles, stars and galaxies drove the initial wave of expansion, and (3) that some other kind of order is driving the accelerating expansion of the universe that kicked off five billion years ago and (A) that increase in order is dark energy, and is the reason that the universe is not now collapsing into a Big Crunch as I showed in the image a couple of pages above. Another great and more funny and entertaining Swedish physicist is Max Tegmark and he also has an interesting, but much shorter video, Consciousness as a State of Matter, given at the FQXi conference 2014 in Vieques, Puerto Rico. In that video, he makes the case from Claude Shannon's information theory view of entropy using Spekkens numbers (bear with him on that, to hear the punch line at the end). The punch line is that when quanta of various kinds (and I would include not only photons, but also the other force carriers, the gauge bosons and the scalar boson) ... when those quanta trace through inanimate matter they increase the entropy of the system, but (B) when those quanta trace through animate matter they decrease the entropy of the system dramatically and that means new order is created in each organism. As evolution proceeds anywhere on earth, we have observed that living systems developed spinal chords and nervous systems (phylum chordata), reflexes, reactive behavior like chemotaxis in bacteria, brains with intelligence supporting consciousness. On this planet, consciousness is not just the province of humans. We are so easily programmed by the cats, dogs and all the animals we interact with, after they have been around us for a while: "they've got your number." If you have a little faith and think about it: (C) the accelerating expansion of the universe which kicked off five billion years ago (before the earth was around) is proof that life not only exists elsewhere, but is a universal phenomenon on a cosmological scale. It's an inescapable conclusion from that very large and observable piece of evidence observed just recently by Perlmutter, Schmidt and Riess. The observation is not really explained by anything else other than entropy driven by life, because five billion years ago, when the universe was 8.5 billion years old, all of the elements, evolved star systems, galaxies with super black holes at their centers, rotating neutron stars, etc., galactic clusters and super-clusters were already there and no new order was being produced that could drive an acceleration of the kind we are observing. It's just "the realm of living beings" inflating the "realm of the environment," reflected in your "realm of the five components." That final definition is stipulated by faith in the Lotus Sutra, of course. Those without faith, at least in the power of intent over randomness, will remain in the dark about it. If you want to know what dark energy is? Have a look in the mirror, hug someone who loves you, say something nice to a perfect stranger, or pet a dog or cat you like. You are looking at it right there, the world of living beings throughout the cosmos are causing it to accelerate its size, just to balance out the extreme order of our unbelievably complex and ordered self-assembled and consciousness -maintaining nervous systems and brains, and we in the realm of living beings are preventing the big crunch from happening, for now, just by continuing to live. As Sensei has said, "Nichiren Daishonin is the greatest sage in the universe." Proof of that is in this quote from this letter he wrote to Shijo Kingo (it is believed he was the recipient) in 1275. From On Omens, WND I, p. 644: Concerning this, the Great Teacher Miao-lo said: “One’s six sense organs represent the points of the compass. It has already been established that the sense of sight and that of smell represent east and west. It follows, then, that the sense of hearing and that of taste correspond to north and south. Center [Note 1: That is, of the compass. The point at which the four directions converge,] corresponds to the mind, and the four directions, to the body. The body is endowed with the four sense organs, and the mind is generally related to all four. Hence the mind induces rise or fall with respect to [the sensory functions of] the body.” [Note 2: The Annotations on “The Words and Phrases of the Lotus Sutra.”]As he says, when life ceases to exist in the universe, and as the "world is a stage" is emptied of its actors and stories, the big crunch will likely roll things up rather rapidly, in a recapitulation of the pace at which space was created back 13.7 billion years ago: crunch! Music of the Spheres: Jeff BeckI have been present for some live cosmic music back in the sixties: I loyally scraped up the ticket price and went to the Winterland Ballroom and the Fillmore West in San Francisco when Bill Graham hosted Jimi Hendrix 3 different times in 1968, and Led Zeppelin's Jimmy Paige 3 different times in 1969. My ears still ring from the Marshall amplifiers! But I never personally saw the guy I think is the greatest of them all, who recently died, Jeff Beck. Fortunately, Jeff did an hour and 40 minutes of unbelievably cosmic music at Ronnie Scott's Jazz Club in Soho, London about ten or so years ago, and he was magnificent, even predominant. He even has a set where Eric Clapton sits in. Jeff Beck, Eric Clapton and Jimmy Paige all played together in the Yardbirds, back before I had a clue. Here is Jeff Beck's set at Ronnie Scott's on YouTube. Had Jimi Hendrix lived longer, he might have developed into a greater genius, like Jeff did, but he didn't survive and because of that Jeff Beck is the greatest of all time, IMHO. Don't bury your greatness in the grave, stay alive! Some kinds of inflation are highly desirable. |
2023.01.21 01:55 10marketing8 Bankman-Fried's lawyers say car hit barricade outside home
2023.01.17 16:18 Zoloft_and_the_RRD Series: Andrew Tate, and the Mythopoetic Men's Movement